1. PLAN Name: How do we know that Jesus is a made-up name?

2. What is the evidence regarding the pronunciation of the „sh” or „s” sound in the name Yesu/Yeshu?

3. Yeshu and satan. Why was the name Yeshu changed, while satan was left as is?

4. Does the name Yeshu/Yesu appear in the Old Covenant?

1 – PLAName – How do we know that Jesus is a made-up name?

We know for certain that Christ’s name is not „Jesus.” Only those uninterested in Biblical truth would insist that it is „Jesus.” Such people typically value family tradition, religious teachings, and the authority of priests, bishops, or the pope more highly—prioritizing these things over the Biblical record.

We, however, prioritize the Biblical record. We examine, verify, and draw conclusions.

God gave us wisdom so that we might personally investigate Biblical truth, as well as truths regarding health, politics, history, and so on. Relying on authorities or tradition leads to yet another „PLAN…” and a great deal of misfortune.

And checking Christ’s name is incredibly simple. You need only glance at the Greek verse—for example, here—to see that the original Greek name for Christ is not *Jesus*. The spelling is *Yeshu*. Just as the names *Yahweh* or *Jehovah* do not appear in the Bible. In the Hebrew text of the Bible, God’s name is written as יהוה—JHWH. Yet religions lie, inserting *Jesus* and *Yahweh/Jehovah* into the Bible. Likewise, the word *Jew* does not appear in the Bible; the term used is *Judean*. And religions lie to their followers…

We must boldly say: Enough with the lies!

Those who care about Biblical truth will cherish and fight for it. Those who do not care will simply shrug it off, claiming they have no head for such things or asking, „What do I care? There are smarter people out there; I don’t know anything about this.” Yet such a person will easily fall into the traps set by globalists—the financial elite and their next… PLAN…

Everyone needs to understand the basics of finance, healthcare, and how the financial elite operates. If we disregard this knowledge, we will fall into the snares of the next PLAN…

The era of ties, white coats, and black robes is over. Those days are in the past. We have been deceived, lied to, and even… killed so many times.

„Authorities” were invented so that people would believe them blindly. That is why there are so few righteous people in this world. These authorities… not only lied to people but also corrupted them with their hypocrisy. Righteous people have crossed over to the side of these bandits. We have proof of this in the PLANdemic…

It is much the same with faith. Orchestrated religions deceive billions of people around the world. Highly dangerous religious-political systems have emerged—such as Islam, Judaism, Hinduism, and so on. These are no longer merely religions, but systems that exert coercive influence over people.

That is why I encourage you to take an interest in the truth in the broadest sense, including Biblical truth.

Today, we are not debating whether the name of Christ is „Jesus.” That is a matter so simple that even a child can verify it. The fact is simply this: „Jesus” was a name that was invented. The issue is not the Figure of Christ Himself, but the fabricated name: „Jesus.”

Faith is not a form of entertainment for mocking the teachings of Christ. That teaching—that Biblical truth—was delivered to the apostles by Christ once and for all. Our task is not to alter those teachings, but to ascertain what they truly are. Every person on earth ought to verify this for themselves; it is not a matter reserved solely for priests or other religious leaders. It concerns everyone. If you place your trust in an authority figure without scrutinizing them closely, you will simply be lied to—at your own behest, dear reader:

“Buy truth and do not sell it—also wisdom, instruction, and understanding” — Proverbs 23:23.

“You will seek Me and find Me when you search for Me with all your heart” — Jeremiah 29:13.

“Help me understand the way of Your commandments, and I will meditate on Your wonderful works” — Psalm 119:27.

… and a verse worth learning by heart—after first understanding it:

„Beloved, while making every effort to write to you about our common salvation, I found it necessary to write to you, urging you to contend earnestly for the faith once for all delivered to the saints” — Jude 1:3.

Here, the phrase „once for all” effectively captures the sense of *hapax*: it refers to something transmitted as a completed act, rather than a faith that successive generations are free to reinvent.

“These were more noble-minded than those in Thessalonica, for they received the Word with all eagerness, examining the Scriptures daily to see whether these things were so” — Acts 17:11.

That is why today we go a step further and consider how the name of Christ was rendered in Hebrew and Greek. We know that in Greek it was written as *Yesu/Jesu*. The Greeks also used inflected forms of the name, resulting in variants such as *Jesus* or *Jesun*. However, the base form of the name is *Yesu*, and it is this form that should be carried over into other languages.

Why do we transfer the form *Yesu* to other languages?

Because *Jesu-s* and *Jesu-n* are Greek inflected forms of the name. If we want to transfer the English name *Thomas* into another language, we transfer that specific form; we would not transfer an English inflected form like *Tom* or *Tommy*. We apply the same principle to the name of Christ.

Let us look at the Greek declension of the name *Yesu*:

• Nominative: Jesu-s (Ἰησοῦς)

• Genitive: Jesu (Ἰησοῦ)

• Dative: Jesu (Ἰησοῦ)

• Accusative: Jesu-n (Ἰησοῦν)

• Vocative: Jesu (Ἰησοῦ)

So we have *Yesu/Jesu* + its inflected forms:

• Jesu + s (Ἰησοῦς)

• Jesu (Ἰησοῦ)

• Jesu + n (Ἰησοῦν)

*Iēsou* (Jesu/Yesu) remains the visible inflectional base, to which *-s* is added in the nominative case and *-n* in the accusative.

Is it really so hard to understand why so many people around the world bow down to Jesus?

Why is the correct name of Christ so important?

Because through Christ and His correct name, we have: immersion, the forgiveness of sins, salvation, and… the joy of life:

“Happy is the man who has found wisdom, and the man who acquires understanding” — Proverbs 3:13.

“Teach me good judgment and knowledge, for I have put faith in Your commandments” — Psalm 119:66.

One of Christ’s commandments is faith in the true name. I recommend memorizing this verse—but first, understanding it:

“And this is His commandment: that we believe in the name of His Son, Yeshu the Anointed One, and love one another, just as He gave us the commandment” — 1 John 3:23.

The word is related to the verb *entellomai*, meaning to command, instruct, or issue a commandment.

Therefore, the word *entolē* does not signify a piece of advice, a suggestion, or a proposal here. It is a clear command from God—a commandment to be carried out.

Thus, in 1 John 3:23, faith in the name of the Son is presented not as an optional possibility, but as a commandment from God.

And one more thought: Christ’s teachings are wonderfully simple. Very easy to grasp logically. It is religions that have complicated them. It is religions that have sold humanity the idea that only they can understand Christ. Yet the Scriptures say otherwise:

„The unfolding of Your words gives light; it gives understanding to the simple” — Psalm 119:130.

„If any of you lacks wisdom, let him ask of God, who gives to all generously and without reproach, and it will be given to him” — James 1:5.

„The heart of the discerning acquires knowledge, and the ear of the wise seeks knowledge” — Proverbs 18:15.

„And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free” — John 8:32.

Artykuł PLAName – How do we know that Jesus is a made-up name? pochodzi z serwisu Jesu.pl.

Artykuł PLANimię – Skąd wiemy, że Jezus to zmyślone imię? pochodzi z serwisu Jesu.pl.

1. Is reincarnation real? (Part 1)

2. After death, the rich man realized there was no turning back. (Part 1)

3. What does the human being actually consist of? (Part 2)

4. Spirit and breath. What are they? (Part 3)

5. The human spirit. How to protect it? (Part 4)

6. The human soul. Can it be killed? (Part 5)

4 – Spirit and breath. What are they? – (Part 3)

Spirit and breath are closely related, but they are not exactly the same concept.

In Hebrew, there are two different words:

• רוּחַ / ruach — spirit, wind, movement, breath, inner life force.

• נְשָׁמָה / neshamah — breath, breath of life, breath given by God.

„Spirit” and „breath” are closely related, as both pertain to life given by God. Yet, they are not the same word.

In Greek, the situation is somewhat different. The Greek word *pneuma* is very broad; it can mean spirit, wind, or breath. Consequently, a single Greek word sometimes encompasses a range of meanings that, in Hebrew, are expressed by distinct concepts.

However, Greek also has a separate word, *pnoē*, which means breath, a puff of air, or a gust. Therefore, one cannot simply say, „In Greek, we have only one word: *pneuma*.”

In Hebrew, „spirit” and „breath” are more clearly distinguished as two separate words, whereas in Greek their meanings often converge, particularly due to the broad scope of the word *pneuma*.

Let us look at the verses.

4.1 God breathed into man the breath of life:

„And YHWH God formed man from the dust of the ground, and breathed into His nostrils the breath of life, and man became a living being” — Genesis 2:7.

This verse contains נִשְׁמַת חַיִּים /*nishmat chayyim*—the breath of life.

This marks the beginning of human life in the body. The body was formed from dust, but man became a living being only when God breathed the breath of life into him.

The breath of life comes from God and gives life to the human body.

4.2 The spirit is in man, and the breath of the Almighty gives understanding:

„But it is the spirit in man, and the breath of the Almighty, that gives them understanding” — Job 32:8.

Two concepts are involved here:

• רוּחַ / ruach – spirit.

• נִשְׁמַת / nishmat — breath.

The author does not use the same word twice; he uses two different words. The meaning of the verse is this: man possesses a spirit, yet true understanding does not stem merely from experience, length of days, or human wisdom. It is the breath of the Almighty that grants understanding. Elihu speaks in the context of the older men who had spoken before him; he had previously assumed that the elderly would possess wisdom, but he came to realize that age alone is not enough.

4.3 God gives breath and spirit:

„This is what God, YHWH, says—He who created the heavens and stretched them out, Who spread out the earth and what grows from it, Who gives breath to the people upon it and spirit to those who walk on it” — Isaiah 42:5.

Here, too, we have two words:

• נְשָׁמָה / neshamah – breath.

• רוּחַ / ruach – spirit.

God gives breath to the people and spirit to those who walk upon the earth.

This shows that man does not possess life of his own accord. His life, breath, and spirit come from God.

4.4 God can take away the spirit and the breath:

“If He were to set His heart on Himself, if He were to gather to Himself His spirit and His breath, then all flesh would perish together, and man would return to dust” — Job 34:14-15.

Here, too, these two words appear:

• spirit — ruach.
• breath — neshamah.

If God withdraws the spirit and the breath, the body perishes and man returns to dust. The verse shows that human life is not independent; man lives because God sustains his life. There is something worth striving for, because it is possible to live for a very long time—indeed, eternally. Those who consciously choose the lies of religion and the lies of the world will be annihilated; that is, their spirit will be taken from them.

4.5 The spirit returns to God:

„And the dust returns to the earth as it was, and the spirit returns to God who gave it” — Ecclesiastes 12:7.

Here, the reference is to the spirit—*ruach*.

The body returns to the earth. The spirit returns to God.

This verse does not say „the breath will return to God,” but „the spirit will return to God.” This shows that the human spirit is something more than mere mechanical breathing—that is, the breath itself.

4.6 The body without the spirit is dead:

„For just as the body without the spirit is dead, so also faith without works is dead” — James 2:26.

The Greek word used here is πνεῦμα/pneuma.

This word can mean „spirit,” but it is also linked to breath and life. The meaning in this verse is simple: a body without the spirit is dead.

This aligns with the Hebrew image: when God takes away the spirit and the breath, the body returns to dust.

The spirit is connected to the life of the body, but it should not be reduced merely to the air in the lungs.

4.7 God gives everyone life, breath, and everything:

“Nor is He served by human hands as if He needed anything, because He Himself gives everyone life, breath, and everything” — Acts 17:25.

In Greek, the word used here is πνοή/pnoē—a breath or exhalation.

This demonstrates that Greek also has a distinct word for breath. Therefore, one must be cautious about claiming that „spirit” and „breath” are always expressed by the same word in Greek.

Greek has the broad term *pneuma*, but it also possesses the separate word *pnoē* for breath.

4.8 Spirit, soul, and body:

„May the God of peace Himself sanctify you completely, and may your whole spirit, soul, and body be kept blameless for the coming of our Lord, Yeshu the Anointed One” — 1 Thessalonians 5:23.

Here, Paul lists:

• spirit — pneuma.
• soul — psychē.
• body — sōma.

He does not mention „breath” here; instead, it speaks of the human being as a whole before God.

This demonstrates that the spirit is part of the full scope of the human being. „Breath,” on the other hand, points more strongly in other passages to the vital breath given by God.

The spirit belongs to the realm of the human person, whereas „breath” points more strongly to the life-giving breath of life.

Put simply:

The breath is more the breath of life given by God.

The spirit is the inner part of man, linked to life, cognition, the record of one’s life, knowledge, and one’s response to God.

• The breath gives life.

• The spirit is within man.

• God gives both.

• God can take both away.

• The body without the spirit is dead.

Are the spirit and the breath the same thing?

Not in the full sense.

In Hebrew, they are not the same word:

• *ruach* is spirit.

• *neshamah* is breath.

They are closely related because both originate from God and both pertain to life. Yet, they are not identical.

In Greek, the word *pneuma* can encompass a wide range of meanings: spirit, wind, and breath. Consequently, the concepts may appear closer in Greek. However, Greek also has *pnoē*—meaning a puff of air or breath.

Spirit and breath are not the same concept, though they are closely related. Breath signifies the life-breath given by God, while spirit signifies the spiritual part of man that comes from God and returns to God.

The Bible does not reduce man merely to a body.

Man was formed from dust, but he received life from God. God gave him the breath of life. God gave him a spirit. The spirit is within man. The breath of the Almighty gives understanding. When God takes away the spirit and the breath, the body dies and returns to dust.

The spirit and the breath are not the same, yet they share a common source—God. Both pertain to human life. That is why it is worth fighting for oneself and for one’s loved ones. One cannot reduce one’s life merely to the body; we also possess a spirit.

How does one preserve the spirit?

God will determine this based on our lives. One must reject religious falsehoods. If you look into it, dear reader, you will find that every religion harbors them. By participating in these religions, you act against God, for you are nurturing a lie.

If you do so knowingly—choosing tradition—be aware that there will be consequences… so says God…

Artykuł Spirit and breath… God gives life, but He can take it away… – Part 3 pochodzi z serwisu Jesu.pl.

4 – Duch i tchnienie. Co to jest? – (3 część)

Artykuł Duch i tchnienie… Bóg daje życie, ale może je zabrać… – 3 część pochodzi z serwisu Jesu.pl.

• 1. Is hair the same thing as a head covering? (Part 1)

• 2. Women covering their heads while prophesying. What does it mean to prophesy? (Part 2)

• 3. Is prophesying the same as reading Bible verses? (Part 2)

• 4. Why is a woman’s head covering so important to God if she is providing spiritual support? (Part 2)

• 5. Why should a woman have authority on her head because of the angels? (Part 3)

• 6. What should be done if a woman cannot grow her hair out due to health reasons or age? (Part 4)

• 7. Biblical examples of head and face coverings. (Part 4)

• 8. Why does Paul command women to remain silent in the assemblies? (Part 5)

• 9. Examples of good and bad prophetesses. (Part 6)

0 – Why should a woman cover her head?

Since this is meant to be a quick and concise answer, I will present it briefly at first, and then in a bit more detail.

Dear Woman:

The Apostle Paul does not command you to cover your head because you are less important. Scripture states that we are all equal before God. Covering your head does not deprive you of the right to pray or engage in spiritual activity. Precisely because you can pray and prophesy, you should do so in accordance with God’s order. Long hair is your natural glory. Remember this; it is a great privilege for women. Scripture says that long hair serves as a woman’s covering, yet Paul speaks separately of an additional head covering for two situations: when praying and when prophesying. The head covering demonstrates that you acknowledge God’s order within the assembly. This matters not only before people but also in the presence of the angels, who witness this order. Therefore, when you pray, place a covering on your head. When you prophesy—that is, when you convey the teachings of Christ and Biblical knowledge from God—wear a head covering.

Let us emphasize an important point, as Scripture states: long hair is a woman’s natural covering and glory. However, 1 Corinthians 11 shows that a woman should additionally cover her head when praying and prophesying.

It is not a matter of demeaning the woman.

It is about:

• regarding obedience to the Word of God,

• regarding the order established by God,

• regarding order in the assembly,

• regarding the visible acknowledgment of authority—hierarchy,

• regarding the testimony before people,

• and regarding the significance of this matter before the angels.

A woman covers her head while praying and prophesying because she serves—both physically and spiritually—within the order established by God. Long hair is her natural glory, and the head covering is a visible expression of the assembly’s order—also for the sake of the angels.

This topic has been discussed in detail in several articles; the first one is here:

https://jesu.pl/women-covering-their-heads-are-hair-and-head-coverings-the-same-thing-part-1/

I will now present a somewhat broader discussion of this topic.

The subject of women covering their heads raises many questions. Some believe it refers only to long hair. Others claim it was merely an ancient tradition. Still others say that a head covering signifies nothing more than acknowledging a man’s authority.

However, the most important question is: What can be concluded from the Biblical text itself?

Paul writes about a woman who prays or prophesies:

“…with her head uncovered, she dishonors her head…” — 1 Corinthians 11:5.

This is the starting point. Paul is not speaking generally about a woman’s attire throughout the day. He does not command her to keep her head covered while cooking, working, shopping, or engaging in ordinary conversation. He lists two specific situations:

• prayer,
• prophesying.

That is precisely when a woman should not have her head uncovered.

1. Hair and headwear are not exactly the same thing.

The most common argument against the headscarf is this: since Paul says that hair is given to a woman as a covering, no additional covering is needed.

Indeed, Paul writes:

“…her hair was given to her as a covering” — 1 Corinthians 11:15.

Long hair is, therefore, a woman’s natural covering. It is also her glory. This must not be disregarded.

However, a few verses earlier, Paul writes:

“If a woman does not cover herself, let her also have her hair cut off…” — 1 Corinthians 11:6.

This passage is very important. Here, Paul distinguishes between two things:

• lack of a head covering,

• having one’s hair cut short.

If long hair were the only covering, Paul’s statement would be difficult to understand. If “does not cover herself” simply meant “does not have long hair,” then the words “let her also have her hair cut” would lose their meaning.

Paul is therefore speaking about two levels:

• long hair— a woman’s natural covering and glory,
• head covering during prayer or prophesying  — a conscious, visible act.

Hair is a gift from nature. A headscarf or other covering is something a woman puts on in a specific situation.

2. Covering up does not mean that a woman is less important.

Some interpret this topic as implying that a woman is of less value than a man. However, the text itself does not say that.

Paul assumes that a woman can:

• to pray,

• to prophesy,

• to build up others,

• to comfort,

• to convey a spiritual word.

The problem, then, is not that a woman acts spiritually. The problem is the way she does it.

Covering the head does not deprive a woman of her dignity.

The covering demonstrates that the woman serves spiritually and, at the same time, acknowledges the order established by God.

3. It is about God’s order.

Paul begins the entire topic by explaining the order of headship:

“…Christ is the head of man, and man is the head of woman…” — 1 Corinthians 11:3.

This verse shows that there is no room for acting at one’s own discretion in the assembly. Everyone has their own place, responsibility, and scope of action.

Christ is the head of man. Man is the head of woman. God is the head of Christ.

This does not mean that a woman is of less value than a man. It is about… procedure for action and accountability

When a woman prays or prophesies, she is acting spiritually. In doing so, a head covering shows that she does not reject this order.

This is especially important in the assembly.

4. God’s order in the assembly

The gathering of believers is not a mere social get-together. It is not a place where everyone does whatever they please.

Paul writes:

“…let all things be done decently and in order” — 1 Corinthians 14:40.

This is one of the most important principles regarding the gathering.

In the gathering, we have:

• prayers,

• prophecies – searching the Scriptures,

• teaching,

• encouragement,

• comfort,

• songs,

• various gifts.

However, everything is to be done according to God’s order.

A spiritual gift does not give a person the right to disregard principles. The fact that someone has something important to say does not mean they can reject the order of the assembly.

Therefore, a woman covering her head while praying or prophesying is not an incidental detail. It is part of the visible order.

By doing this, a woman demonstrates:

• I can pray,

• I can prophesy,

• I can offer spiritual support,

• I do not act outside the order established by God.

This is very important. In the assembly, it is not only what we do that counts. How we do it matters, too.

5. What does it mean to prophesy?

Prophesying does not mean solely foretelling the future.

Paul writes:

“…speaks to people for their upbuilding, encouragement, and comfort” — 1 Corinthians 14:3.

Thus, prophesying can mean conveying a word that:

• builds a person up,

• encourages them,

• comforts,

• admonishes,

• shows the right direction.

Not every instance of reading a verse constitutes prophesying; reading is simply reading. Explaining a verse is usually a matter of teaching or encouragement.

Prophesying occurs when a person speaks a word from God to others—a word that addresses a specific need and serves to edify or bring clarity.

If a woman exercises her spiritual gifts in this way, Paul instructs her to have her head covered.

6. “Because of the angels”

Paul gives one more specific reason:

“…a woman ought to have a sign of authority on her head because of the angels” — 1 Corinthians 11:10.

The Greek text does not contain the word “sign” here. There is the word:

ἐξουσία — exousia

Which means:

• power,

• authority,

• law,

• entitlement.

The strongest interpretation of this passage is that the angels are heavenly witnesses to the order of the assembly.

The assembly does not take place merely before people; what happens among believers also holds significance in the spiritual realm.

Therefore, the order of the assembly is not merely a matter of organization. It is not simply about the meeting being orderly and presentable.

It is about something greater.

Heaven sees whether God’s people are acting in obedience or according to their own will.

In this light, the head covering demonstrates that a woman consciously acknowledges God’s order—even in the presence of angels.

This does not mean that the fabric itself possesses magical power. It is not a question of the material, the color, or a specific style.

It is a matter of a visible action that demonstrates: I acknowledge God’s order and wish to serve in accordance with it.

7. Does it refer to the husband as a covering?

Scripture says that the man is the head of the woman:

“…the man is the head of the woman…” — 1 Corinthians 11:3.

But there is no verse that says:

„The husband is the woman’s head covering.”

The husband is called the head. He is not called a covering.

Therefore, these two concepts cannot be interchanged.

The order of headship explains why a covering matters. But the husband himself is neither a cloth nor a head covering.

8. What about a woman who cannot have long hair?

If a woman cannot grow her hair long due to age, illness, medical treatment, or physical frailty, this does not constitute rebellion against God.

If nature grants her long hair, it is her glory.

If, due to age or illness, nature no longer provides it, this is not disobedience.

God does not hold a person accountable for a condition beyond their control.

Such a woman can still cover her head while praying or prophesying; the head covering does not depend on the length of her hair.

Artykuł Why Should a Woman Cover Her Head? – a Quick Explanation pochodzi z serwisu Jesu.pl.

0 – Dlaczego kobieta ma zakrywać głowę?

Z tego względu, że ma być to szybka i treściwa odpowiedź, to przedstawię najpierw krótko, a później trochę szerzej.

Droga Kobieto:

Apostoł Paweł nie nakazuje ci zakrywać głowy dlatego, że jesteś mniej ważna. Pismo mówi, że wszyscy jesteśmy równi przed Bogiem. Zakrycie nie odbiera ci prawa do modlitwy ani duchowego działania. Właśnie dlatego, że możesz modlić się i prorokować, powinnaś robić to zgodnie z porządkiem Boga. Długie włosy są twoją naturalną chwałą. Zapamiętaj to. To wielki przywilej kobiet. Pismo mówi, że długie włosy są zakryciem kobiety, ale Paweł osobno mówi o dodatkowym nakrywaniu głowy w dwóch sytuacjach: przy modleniu się i przy prorokowaniu. Chusta pokazuje, że uznajesz porządek Boga w zgromadzeniu. Ma to znaczenie nie tylko wobec ludzi, ale także ze względu na aniołów, którzy są świadkami tego porządku. Dlatego, gdy się modlisz, to nałóż na głowę chustę. Gdy prorokujesz, czyli przekazujesz nauki Chrystusa, wiedzę biblijną pochodzącą od Boga, to załóż na głowę chustę.

Podkreślmy ważną rzecz, jak pisze Pismo: długie włosy są naturalnym okryciem i chwałą kobiety. Jednak 1 Koryntian 11 pokazuje, że podczas modlitwy i prorokowania kobieta powinna dodatkowo zakryć głowę.

Nie chodzi o poniżenie kobiety.

Chodzi:

• o posłuszeństwo wobec Słowu Boga,
• o porządek ustanowiony przez Boga,
• o porządek w zgromadzeniu,
• o  widzialne uznanie autorytetu – hierarchii,
• o świadectwo wobec ludzi,
• oraz o znaczenie tej sprawy wobec aniołów.

Kobieta zakrywa głowę podczas modlitwy i prorokowania, ponieważ służy cieleśnie i duchowo w porządku ustanowionym przez Boga. Długie włosy są jej naturalną chwałą, a chusta jest widzialnym okazaniem porządku zgromadzenia — także ze względu na aniołów.

Ten temat został szczegółowo omówiony w kilku artykułach, pierwszy jest tutaj:

https://jesu.pl/kobieta-powinna-zakrywac-glowe-czy-wlosy-sa-tym-samym-co-chusta

Teraz przedstawię trochę szersze omówienie tego tematu

Temat zakrywania głowy przez kobietę budzi wiele pytań. Jedni uważają, że chodzi tylko o długie włosy. Inni twierdzą, że była to wyłącznie dawna tradycja. Jeszcze inni mówią, że nakrycie głowy oznacza tylko uznanie autorytetu mężczyzny.

Jednak najważniejsze pytanie brzmi: co wynika z samego tekstu biblijnego?

Paweł pisze o kobiecie, która modli się albo prorokuje:

„…z odkrytą głową hańbi swoją głowę…” — 1 Koryntian 11:5.

To jest punkt wyjścia. Paweł nie mówi ogólnie o ubraniu kobiety przez cały dzień. Nie nakazuje jej chodzić z nakrytą głową podczas gotowania, pracy, zakupów czy zwykłej rozmowy. Wymienia dwie konkretne sytuacje:

• modlitwę,
• prorokowanie.

Właśnie wtedy kobieta nie powinna mieć odkrytej głowy.

1. Włosy i nakrycie głowy nie są dokładnie tym samym

Najczęstszy argument przeciwko chuście brzmi tak: skoro Paweł mówi, że włosy są dane kobiecie za okrycie, to nie potrzeba już żadnego dodatkowego nakrycia.

Rzeczywiście, Paweł pisze:

„…włosy zostały jej dane za okrycie” — 1 Koryntian 11:15.

Długie włosy są więc naturalnym okryciem kobiety. Są również jej chwałą. Nie wolno tego lekceważyć.

Jednak kilka wersetów wcześniej Paweł pisze:

„Jeśli kobieta się nie nakrywa, niech się także ostrzyże…” — 1 Koryntian 11:6.

Ten fragment jest bardzo ważny. Paweł rozróżnia tutaj dwie rzeczy:

• brak nakrycia,
• ostrzyżenie włosów.

Gdyby długie włosy były jedynym nakryciem, zdanie Pawła byłoby trudne do zrozumienia. Jeśli „nie nakrywa się” znaczyłoby po prostu „nie ma długich włosów”, to słowa: „niech się także ostrzyże” traciłyby swój sens.

Paweł mówi więc o dwóch poziomach:

• długie włosy — naturalne okrycie i chwała kobiety,
• nakrycie głowy podczas modlitwy albo prorokowania — świadome, widzialne działanie.

Włosy są tym, co daje natura. Chusta albo inne nakrycie jest tym, co kobieta zakłada w określonej sytuacji.

2. Zakrycie nie oznacza, że kobieta jest mniej ważna

Niektórzy odbierają ten temat tak, jakby kobieta była mniej wartościowa niż mężczyzna. Jednak sam tekst tego nie mówi.

Paweł zakłada, że kobieta może:

• modlić się,
• prorokować,
• budować innych,
• pocieszać,
• przekazywać duchowe słowo.

Problemem nie jest więc to, że kobieta działa duchowo. Problemem jest to, w jaki sposób to robi.

Zakrycie głowy nie odbiera kobiecie godności. 

Zakrycie pokazuje, że kobieta służy duchowo i jednocześnie uznaje porządek ustanowiony przez Boga.

3. Chodzi o porządek Boga

Paweł rozpoczyna cały temat od wyjaśnienia porządku głowy:

„…głową mężczyzny jest Chrystus, a głową kobiety mężczyzna…” — 1 Koryntian 11:3.

Ten werset pokazuje, że w zgromadzeniu nie ma samowoli. Każdy ma swoje miejsce, odpowiedzialność i zakres działania.

Chrystus jest głową mężczyzny. Mężczyzna jest głową kobiety. Bóg jest głową Chrystusa.

To nie oznacza, że kobieta jest mniej wartościowa od mężczyzny. Chodzi o porządek działania i odpowiedzialności.

Kiedy kobieta modli się albo prorokuje, działa duchowo. Wtedy nakrycie głowy pokazuje, że nie odrzuca tego porządku.

To jest ważne szczególnie w zgromadzeniu.

4. Porządek Boga w zgromadzeniu

Zgromadzenie wierzących nie jest zwykłym spotkaniem towarzyskim. Nie jest miejscem, w którym każdy robi to, co chce.

Paweł pisze:

„…wszystko niech się dzieje godnie i według porządku” — 1 Koryntian 14:40.

To jest jedna z najważniejszych zasad dotyczących zgromadzenia.

W zgromadzeniu mamy:

• modlitwy,
• proroctwa – badanie Pism,
• nauczanie,
• zachęta,
• pocieszenie,
• pieśni,
• różne dary.

Jednak wszystko ma odbywać się w porządku Boga.

Dar duchowy nie daje człowiekowi prawa do lekceważenia zasad. To, że ktoś ma coś ważnego do powiedzenia, nie oznacza, że może odrzucić porządek zgromadzenia.

Dlatego nakrycie głowy przez kobietę podczas modlitwy albo prorokowania nie jest przypadkowym dodatkiem. Jest częścią widzialnego porządku.

Kobieta pokazuje przez to:

• mogę modlić się,
• mogę prorokować,
• mogę wspierać duchowo,
• nie działam poza porządkiem ustanowionym przez Boga.

To jest bardzo ważne. W zgromadzeniu nie liczy się tylko to, co robimy. Liczy się również to, jak to robimy.

5. Co znaczy prorokować?

Prorokowanie nie oznacza wyłącznie przepowiadania przyszłości.

Paweł pisze:

„…mówi do ludzi ku zbudowaniu, zachęcie i pocieszeniu” — 1 Koryntian 14:3.

Prorokowanie może więc oznaczać przekazanie słowa, które:

• buduje człowieka,
• zachęca go,
• pociesza,
• napomina,
• pokazuje właściwy kierunek.

Nie każde czytanie wersetu jest prorokowaniem. Samo czytanie to czytanie. Wyjaśnianie wersetu jest najczęściej nauczaniem albo zachętą.

Prorokowanie pojawia się wtedy, gdy człowiek mówi do ludzi słowo od Boga, które trafia w konkretną potrzebę i służy zbudowaniu, wyjaśnieniu.

Jeżeli kobieta właśnie w taki sposób działa duchowo, Paweł nakazuje jej mieć zakrytą głowę.

6. „Ze względu na aniołów”

Paweł podaje jeszcze jeden szczególny powód:

„…kobieta powinna mieć władzę na głowie ze względu na aniołów” — 1 Koryntian 11:10.

W greckim tekście nie ma tutaj słowa „znak”. Jest wyraz:

ἐξουσία — exousia

Znaczy między innymi:

• władza,
• autorytet,
• prawo,
• uprawnienie.

Najmocniejsze rozumienie tego fragmentu jest takie, że aniołowie są niebiańskimi świadkami porządku zgromadzenia.

Zgromadzenie nie odbywa się tylko przed ludźmi. To, co dzieje się wśród wierzących, ma znaczenie także w świecie duchowym.

Dlatego porządek zgromadzenia nie jest tylko sprawą organizacyjną. Nie chodzi tylko o to, aby spotkanie było spokojne i dobrze wyglądało.

Chodzi o coś większego.

Niebo widzi, czy lud Boga działa w posłuszeństwie, czy w samowoli.

W tym ujęciu nakrycie głowy pokazuje, że kobieta świadomie uznaje porządek Boga także wobec aniołów.

Nie oznacza to, że sama tkanina ma magiczną moc. Nie chodzi o materiał, kolor czy konkretny fason.

Chodzi o widzialne działanie, które pokazuje: uznaję porządek Boga i chcę służyć zgodnie z nim.

7. Czy chodzi o męża jako nakrycie?

Pismo mówi, że mężczyzna jest głową kobiety:

„…głową kobiety jest mężczyzna…” — 1 Koryntian 11:3.

Ale nie ma wersetu, który mówi:

„mąż jest nakryciem głowy kobiety”.

Mąż jest nazwany głową. Nie jest nazwany nakryciem.

Dlatego nie można zamieniać tych dwóch pojęć.

Porządek głowy wyjaśnia, dlaczego nakrycie ma znaczenie. Ale sam mąż nie jest chustą ani nakryciem głowy.

8. Co z kobietą, która nie może mieć długich włosów?

Jeżeli kobieta nie może zapuścić włosów z powodu wieku, choroby, leczenia albo osłabienia organizmu, nie jest to bunt wobec Boga.

Jeśli natura daje jej długie włosy, są one jej chwałą.

Jeśli z powodu wieku albo choroby natura już ich nie daje, nie jest to nieposłuszeństwo.

Bóg nie oskarża człowieka za stan, na który ten człowiek nie ma wpływu.

Taka kobieta nadal może zakryć głowę podczas modlitwy albo prorokowania. Chusta nie zależy od długości włosów.

Artykuł Dlaczego kobieta ma zakrywać głowę? – szybkie wyjaśnienie pochodzi z serwisu Jesu.pl.

≡

1. 1. Is reincarnation real? (Part 1)

2. 2. After death, the rich man realized there was no return. (Part 1)

3. 3. What does the human being actually consist of? (Part 2)

4. 4. Spirit and breath. What are they? (Part 3)

5. 5. The human spirit. How can it be protected? (Part 4)

6. 6. The human soul. Can it be killed? (Part 5)

3 – What does the human figure really consist of? – (Part 2)

3.1 Based on 1 Thessalonians 5:23, it can be said that the human being is composed of spirit, soul, and body:

„May the God of peace Himself sanctify you completely, and may your whole spirit, soul, and body be kept blameless for the coming of our Lord, Yeshu the Anointed One” — 1 Thessalonians 5:23.

Let’s try a slightly more difficult version of this verse:

„May the God of peace Himself sanctify you completely/entire/whole / complete / without omission / undamaged (G3648), and may your whole spirit, soul, and body be preserved/ undamaged / safeguarded / protected (G5083) blameless (G274) at the coming of our Lord, Yeshu the Anointed One” — 1 Thessalonians 5:23.

The verse contains these three words, which we discuss in detail in the articles:

• spirit – πνεῦμα / pneuma,

• soul – ψυχή / psychē,

• body – σῶμα / sōma.

The text shows that, before God, man consists of spirit, soul, and body. These are very important matters for understanding who and what we are.

3.2 Soul and spirit in the verses

This verse does not describe the entire makeup of a human being, but it reveals something important: the Word of God distinguishes between soul and spirit just as the body distinguishes between joints and marrow. A person has a physical aspect as well as a deep inner self that they often cannot clearly discern themselves:

„For the word of God is living and effective, sharper than any two-edged sword, penetrating even to the division of soul and spirit, of joints and marrow, and able to judge the thoughts and intentions of the heart” — Hebrews 4:12.

Here, the body is portrayed as dust returning to the earth, and the spirit as that which returns to God. This strongly confirms that the body and the spirit are not the same:

„And the dust returns to the earth as it was, and the spirit returns to God who gave it” — Ecclesiastes 12:7.

The next verse shows the relationship between body and spirit;

„For just as the body without the spirit is dead, so also faith without works is dead” — James 2:26.

The human body is visible; it can be recognized. But if the spirit is absent, there is no life.

James then applies this image to faith: faith without works is dead.

In other words, one can speak of faith, know the right words, and claim to believe, but if that faith does not bear good fruit, it is dead.

What does this verse say about the spirit?

It shows that the spirit is linked to the life of the body.

James does not say: a body without joy is dead. He does not say: a body without thought is dead.

He says: a body without the spirit is dead.

This is important.

Here, the spirit is not merely an emotion or a psychological state. It is presented as a reality without which the human body is dead.

Just as a body without the spirit is merely a dead body, so faith without works is merely a dead profession.

Let us now turn to a very interesting verse:

“And do not fear those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul; rather, fear Him who can destroy both soul and body in Gehenna” — Matthew 10:28.

What does Christ say in this verse?

A person can destroy the body; they can bring about the body’s death. But they have no ultimate power over the spirit and the soul. When a person is murdered, or when a loved one dies, we must realize that the person has merely lost their body. The spirit and soul continue to exist. One need only restore the body, and the person lives in the body once more.

With this design—this process of human creation—the Lord God has checkmated satan and his servants. They may instigate wars, murders, and cruel crimes, but in reality, they kill only the body.

Let us remember this verse, for it transforms our perspective on human death. In Matthew 10:28, the Lord Yeshu speaks very clearly: a person can kill the body but cannot kill the soul. This means that, in this verse, the soul is not the same thing as the body.

3.3 Let’s Summarize

The Apostle Paul says that throughout our lives we are to care for these three elements of our being: spirit, soul, and body. These three elements are to be preserved—protected from defilement, corruption, and destruction—until the coming of Christ.

This meaning is also confirmed by 2 Corinthians 7:1, where Paul speaks of cleansing not only the body but also the spirit:

“Let us cleanse ourselves of every defilement of body and spirit, perfecting holiness in the fear of God” — 2 Corinthians 7:1.

This is important. Sin can affect the body, but it can also affect the spirit. Therefore, a person must care not only for their outward appearance but also for their inner state before God.

That is why we need to clearly understand what the spirit and the soul are. Then we will be able to protect them from destruction or corruption. Just as we must care for the body and our health, we must also care for the spirit and the soul.

The Bible presents the human being as a whole comprising spirit, soul, and body. We must accept this as a fact and then examine individually what the spirit, the soul, and the body are. Without this foundation, one might easily reduce oneself merely to the body, whereas the Bible presents a broader perspective on the subject.

The body can be killed by man, but man cannot kill the soul. Paul prays that the whole person—spirit, soul, and body—may be preserved blameless for the coming of the Lord.

I invite you to join me for the subsequent parts of this series.

Artykuł A person can kill the body, but cannot kill the soul… This is checkmate for murderers – Part 2 pochodzi z serwisu Jesu.pl.

3 – Z czego tak naprawdę składa się postać człowieka? – (2 część)

Apostoł Paweł mówi, że mamy dbać przez całe swoje życie o te trzy elementy naszego życia: o ducha, duszę i ciało. Te trzy elementy mają być zachowane, chronione przed skalaniem, zepsuciem, przed zniszczeniem, aż do przyjścia Chrystusa.

Ten sens potwierdza też 2 Koryntian 7:1, gdzie Paweł mówi o oczyszczeniu nie tylko ciała, ale także ducha:

„Oczyśćmy samych siebie od wszelkiego skalania ciała i ducha, dopełniając świętości w bojaźni Boga” — 2 Koryntian 7:1.

To jest ważne. Grzech może dotykać ciała, ale może też dotykać ducha. Dlatego człowiek nie ma dbać tylko o widoczny wygląd, ale też o wewnętrzny stan przed Bogiem.

Dlatego powinniśmy dokładnie zrozumieć: czym jest duch i dusza. Wtedy będziemy mogli je chronić przed zniszczeniem/zepsuciem. Tak samo, jak musimy dbać o ciało, o nasze zdrowie, to również mu simy dbać o ducha i duszę.

Biblia pokazuje człowieka jako całość obejmującą ducha, duszę i ciało. To trzeba przyjąć do wiadomości, jako fakt i wtedy należy osobno badać, czym jest duch, czym jest dusza i czym jest ciało. Bez tego fundamentu człowiek łatwo sprowadza siebie tylko do ciała, a Biblia pokazuje ten temat szerzej.

Ciało może zostać zabite przez człowieka, ale duszy człowiek nie może zabić. Paweł modli się, aby cały człowiek — duch, dusza i ciało — został zachowany bez zarzutu na przyjście Pana.

Zapraszam do kolejnych części z tego tematu.

Artykuł Człowiek może zabić ciało, ale duszy nie zabije… To jest szach-mat dla morderców – część 2 pochodzi z serwisu Jesu.pl.

Reincarnation is the belief that a person’s existence does not end at death; instead, their „soul,” „consciousness,” or „self” returns to life in another body.

Put simply: a person dies → leaves the body → is reborn as another human, an animal, or a living being.

• Eastern religions — describe reincarnation as a cycle of birth, death, and rebirth from which a person is eventually meant to be liberated.

• Karma — refers to the belief that actions in one’s current life influence one’s destiny in the next incarnation.

• New Age — presents reincarnation as a spiritual „school” where the soul returns to Earth to gain experience.

• Esotericism and occultism — link reincarnation to practices aimed at seeking knowledge about „past lives” apart from God.

• Pop culture — portrays reincarnation as a mysterious tale of returns, past lives, and unfinished business.

These are the most common views regarding human life and death held by many people.

Let us instead turn to God—the Creator of the entire world—for knowledge.

Let us examine the Bible to see what happens to a person after death.

How many times does a person actually die?

Is reincarnation real?

We can understand reincarnation if we analyze the whole subject: spirit, soul, and body.

The answers will be fascinating…

2. After death, the rich man realized there was no turning back…

Let us begin with the story of Lazarus and the Rich Man:

„There was a certain rich man who dressed in purple and fine linen and feasted sumptuously every day. There was also a poor man named Lazarus, laid at his gate, covered with sores. He longed to satisfy his hunger with what fell from the rich man’s table; and even the dogs came and licked his sores. And it came to pass that the poor man died and was carried by the angels to Abraham’s bosom; the rich man also died and was buried. And being in Hades, in torment, he lifted up his eyes and saw Abraham from afar, and Lazarus in his bosom. And he cried out: Father Abraham, have mercy on me and send Lazarus to dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue, for I am in pain in this flame. But Abraham said: Child, remember that you received your good things in your lifetime, and Lazarus likewise the bad; but now he is comforted here, and you are in pain. And besides all this, a great chasm has been fixed between us and you, so that those who wish to pass from here to you cannot, nor can anyone cross over from there to us. Then he said: I beg you, therefore, father, to send him to my father’s house. For I have five brothers—let him bear witness to them, so that they too do not come to this place of torment. Abraham said to him: They have Moses and the Prophets; let them listen to them. But he said: No, Father Abraham, but if someone from the dead goes to them, they will repent. And he said to him: If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, then even if someone from…” …someone rises from the dead, they will not be convinced” — Luke 16:19-31.

Let’s see how much controversy there is here:

2.1 – Is it a parable or a description of reality after death?

Some see this as a parable or story told by Christ, while others believe it describes the actual state of life after death.

2.2 – Is a person conscious after death?

The text depicts the rich man after his death: conscious, speaking, remembering his family, and suffering.

2.3 – What is Hades?

Biblical verses state that a person undergoes punishment following God’s judgment. Punishments involving so-called fire take place in Gehenna or the lake of fire. Here, however, the text speaks of Hades. The Bible describes Hades and Sheol as the place where people go after death; here, they are depicted as involving punishment by fire.

2.4 – Can one change one’s fate after death?

The text speaks of a „great chasm” that cannot be crossed, so no return to earth after death is depicted here. Yet, we have a verse suggesting that the Gospel was preached to the dead. To what end? Why?

Is The Good News Preached to The Dead?

2.5 – Can the dead return and warn the living?

The rich man asks Abraham to send the deceased Lazarus to his brothers to teach them how to live wisely. Abraham replies that they should listen to Moses and the Prophets. He does not deny that the dead could be sent.

2.6 – Does this passage contradict reincarnation?

The story of the rich man confirms that the spirit or soul does not die; it can rise and appear to the living. It also challenges the concept of reincarnation, as it depicts death, a conscious state following death, and the absence of any return to a new earthly life. The rich man cannot return to his brothers on his own initiative; instead, he asks Abraham for permission to send someone back from the dead.

To understand these various controversies, one must look at what the Creator of this world says. He knows best what happens to a person after death: do we die once, twice, or many times? Is it possible to continue living after death? Does a person feel anything? Does one even remain a human being at that stage? These are just a few of the questions involved.

I invite you to read the next article in this series, but in the meantime, dear reader, consider this thought:

„And just as it is appointed for people to die once, and after that, judgment.” — Hebrews 9:27.

Greek text: καὶ καθ’ ὅσον ἀπόκειται τοῖς ἀνθρώποις ἅπαξ ἀποθανεῖν, μετὰ δὲ τοῦτο κρίσις

Key words – Strong:

My Analysis:

This verse says: it is appointed for people to die once, and then comes judgment.

The word ἅπαξ / hapax / G530 is very important here, as it means „once.” The text does not speak of multiple deaths, multiple earthly lives, or a cycle of returns; it speaks of a single human death and the judgment that follows it.

The word κρίσις / krisis / G2920 signifies judgment, a decision, or a verdict. Thus, after death, a person does not pass into another incarnation but instead faces God’s verdict.

Let’s throw in a few more verses…

Responsibility for life in the body:

“For we must all be revealed before the tribunal of the Anointed One, so that each one may receive according to what he has done through the body, whether good or bad” — 2 Corinthians 5:10.

Resurrection, not reincarnation:

„Do not be amazed at this, for the hour is coming when all who are in the graves will hear His voice and come out: those who have done good, to the resurrection of life, and those who have done evil, to the resurrection of judgment” — John 5:28-29.

The appointed day of judgment:

“Because He has set a day on which He will judge the inhabited earth in righteousness by the Man whom He has appointed, giving proof to all by raising Him from the dead” — Acts 17:31.

Artykuł Reincarnation. After Death, the Rich Man Realized There Was No Turning Back… – Part 1 pochodzi z serwisu Jesu.pl.

1. Czy reinkarnacja jest prawdziwa?

Reinkarnacja to pogląd mówiący, że po śmierci człowiek nie kończy swojego istnienia, lecz jego „dusza”, „świadomość” albo „ja” wraca ponownie do życia w innym ciele.

Najprościej mówiąc: człowiek umiera → opuszcza ciało → rodzi się ponownie jako inny człowiek, zwierzę albo istota żywa.

• Religie Wschodu — opisują reinkarnację jako cykl narodzin, śmierci i ponownych narodzin, z którego człowiek ma się kiedyś uwolnić.
• Karma — oznacza przekonanie, że czyny z obecnego życia wpływają na los człowieka w następnym wcieleniu.
• New Age — przedstawia reinkarnację jako duchową „szkołę”, w której dusza wraca na ziemię, aby zdobywać doświadczenia.
• Ezoteryka i okultyzm — łączą reinkarnację z praktykami szukania wiedzy o „poprzednich wcieleniach” poza Bogiem.
• Popkultura — pokazuje reinkarnację jako tajemniczą historię o powrotach, dawnych życiach i niedokończonych sprawach.

To są najczęstsze poglądy o życiu i śmierci człowieka, które wyznaje wiele osób.

My zwróćmy się po wiedzę do Boga, który stworzył cały świat.

Sprawdźmy w wersetach biblijnych, co dzieje się z człowiekiem po śmierci?

Ile tak naprawdę razy człowiek umiera?

Czy reinkarnacja jest prawdziwa?

Zrozumiemy reinkarnację, jeżeli przeanalizujemy całe zagadnienie: ducha, duszy i ciała.

Odpowiedzi będą bardzo ciekawe…

2. Bogacz po śmierci zrozumiał, że nie ma powrotu…

Zacznijmy najpierw od historii o Łazarzu i Bogaczu:

„A był pewien człowiek bogaty, który ubierał się w purpurę i bisior, i każdego dnia biesiadował wystawnie. Był też pewien ubogi, imieniem Łazarz, położony u jego bramy, pokryty wrzodami. Pragnął nasycić się tym, co spadało ze stołu bogacza; a nawet psy przychodziły i lizały jego wrzody.

I stało się, że umarł ubogi i został zaniesiony przez aniołów na łono Abrahama; umarł też bogacz i został pogrzebany. A będąc w Hadesie, w mękach, podniósł swoje oczy i zobaczył z daleka Abrahama oraz Łazarza na jego łonie.

I zawołał: Ojcze Abrahamie, zmiłuj się nade mną i poślij Łazarza, aby umoczył koniec swego palca w wodzie i ochłodził mój język, bo cierpię ból w tym płomieniu.

Abraham zaś powiedział: Dziecko, przypomnij sobie, że otrzymałeś swoje dobra w swoim życiu, a Łazarz podobnie zło; teraz zaś on tutaj jest pocieszany, a ty cierpisz ból. A oprócz tego wszystkiego między nami a wami została utwierdzona wielka przepaść, aby ci, którzy chcą przejść stąd do was, nie mogli, ani stamtąd do nas nie przeprawiali się.

Powiedział więc: Proszę cię zatem, ojcze, abyś posłał go do domu mojego ojca. Mam bowiem pięciu braci, aby dał im świadectwo, żeby i oni nie przyszli do tego miejsca męki.

Abraham powiedział mu: Mają Mojżesza i Proroków; niech ich słuchają.

On zaś powiedział: Nie, ojcze Abrahamie, ale jeśli ktoś z umarłych pójdzie do nich, opamiętają się.

Powiedział mu zaś: Jeśli Mojżesza i Proroków nie słuchają, to nawet jeśli ktoś z umarłych powstanie, nie dadzą się przekonać” — Łukasza 16:19-31.

Zobaczmy, ile tutaj jest kontrowersji:

2.1 – Czy to przypowieść, czy opis rzeczywistości po śmierci?

Jedni widzą tu przypowieść/opowieść Chrystusa, inni uważają, że opisuje realny stan życia po śmierci.

2.2 – Czy człowiek po śmierci jest świadomy?

Tekst pokazuje bogacza po swojej śmierci: świadomego, mówiącego, pamiętającego rodzinę i cierpiącego.

2.3 – Czym jest Hades?

Wersety biblijne mówią, że człowiek ponosi ewentualną karę po Sądzie Bożym. Kary tzw ognia dokonują się w: gehennie lub w jeziorze ognia. Tymczasem tutaj mowa jest o Hadesie. Biblia opisuje Hades i Szeol jako miejsce, do którego trafiają ludzie po śmierci. Tutaj są opisane jako kary ognia.

2.4 – Czy po śmierci można zmienić swój los?

Tekst mówi o „wielkiej przepaści”, której nie można przekroczyć, więc po śmierci nie ma tu pokazanego powrotu na ziemię. Mamy za to werset, który sugeruje, że umarłym głoszona była Ewangelia. Po co? Dlaczego?

https://jesu.pl/czy-umarlym-gloszona-jest-dobra-nowina

2.5 – Czy zmarli mogą wracać i ostrzegać żywych?

Bogacz prosi, aby Abraham wysłał zmarłego Łazarza do swoich braci, w celu przekazania im, jak mądrze żyć. Abraham odpowiada, żeby słuchali Mojżesza i Proroków. Nie zaprzecza, że nie można posłać zmarłych.

2.6 – Czy ten fragment zaprzecza reinkarnacji?

Historia o bogaczu potwierdza, że duch/dusza nie umiera, może powstać i ukazać się żyjącym. Również uderza w reinkarnację, bo pokazuje śmierć, świadomy stan po śmierci i brak powrotu do nowego ziemskiego życia. Bogacz nie może sam od siebie, wrócić do swoich braci. Prosi Abrahama o zgodę wysłania zmarłego. 

Aby zrozumieć te wszystkie kontrowersje, należy sprawdzić, co mówi Stworzyciel tego świata. On wie najlepiej, co dzieje się z człowiekiem po śmierci, czy umiera raz, dwa czy wiele razy? Czy po śmierci można dalej żyć? Czy człowiek coś czuje, czy w ogóle wtedy jest człowiekiem i wiele innych kwestii.

Zapraszam do kolejnego artykułu z tej serii, a w międzyczasie przeanalizuj sobie Czytelniku tę myśl:

Artykuł Reinkarnacja. Bogacz po śmierci zrozumiał, że nie ma powrotu… – część 1 pochodzi z serwisu Jesu.pl.